Loading, please wait...
Date: Jan 23, 2017 09:30 AM - Feb 25, 2017 12:00 PM
Fee
CE Hours
CE Units
Activity Type
- Application
Target Audience(s)
- Pharmacists
Accreditation(s)
The purpose of the AACP Continuing Professional Development program is to provide continuing professional development opportunities to members and others eligible who are dedicated to life-long learning. AACP will provide high quality, active, engaging educational programming enabling individuals to continuously improve their knowledge and skills.
|
|
|
The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education as a provider of continuing pharmacy education.
|
Requirements for CE Credit
| View all |
Objectives
- Identify each of the essential learning tools provided.
- Conform to the agreed upon guidelines for effective instruction.
- Assess the admission policies, process, practices, and prevailing perceptions using the Holistic Review Admissions Assessment Tool.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
Jennifer Adams, Pharm.D., Ed.D
|
|
|
S. Elizabeth White |
|
|
Venita Sposetti |
Activity Number
0581-0000-17-001-L04-PCE Hours
Objectives
- Identify each of the essential learning tools provided.
- Conform to the agreed upon guidelines for effective instruction.
- Assess the admission policies, process, practices, and prevailing perceptions using the Holistic Review Admissions Assessment Tool.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
Jennifer Adams, Pharm.D., Ed.D
|
|
|
S. Elizabeth White |
|
|
Venita Sposetti |
Activity Number
0581-0000-17-002-L04-PCE Hours
Objectives
- Define holistic review.
- Define the four key factors which influence admission decisions.
- Identify the relevant dimensions of diversity using the Experiences-Attributes-Academic Metrics Model.
- Describe unconscious bias and how it can interfere with admissions outcomes.
- Differentiate the terms “holistic review” and a “holistic admissions process.”
- Describe the role diversity plays in service of the school’s mission.
- Identify two strategies for minimizing undue influence in the admissions process.
- Reassess the questions in Part 1 of the Holistic Review Admissions Assessment Tool.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
S. Elizabeth White |
|
|
Venita Sposetti |
Activity Number
0581-0000-17-003-L04-PCE Hours
Objectives
- Evaluate the school’s current admissions policy, process, and practice using the Four Core Principles of a Holistic Admission Process.
- Describe the Diversity Excellence Paradigm.
- Determine and record the outcomes to be achieved by your school when leveraging diversity (broadly defined).
- Cite three benefits of making data-informed admission-related decisions.
- Provide an example that represents the notion of “shaping the class.”
- Share three examples of why it’s important to evaluate admission outcomes.
- Identify three out of the five legal requirements for institutions using race and ethnicity conscious policies from those presented in their materials.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
S. Elizabeth White |
|
|
Venita Sposetti |
Activity Number
0581-0000-17-004-L04-PCE Hours
Objectives
- Compare and contrast the characteristics of successful schools, identifying those that are currently doing well as well as those where work may be needed.
- Describe what is meant by the term “alignment” in the context of a holistic admissions process.
- Identify three benefits of continuous quality improvement (CQI) for work in admissions.
- Conduct an initial review of Kotter’s Accelerated 8-Step Change Model.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
S. Elizabeth White |
|
|
Venita Sposetti |
Activity Number
0581-0000-17-005-L04-PCE Hours
Objectives
- Complete a thorough draft of the first three of the eight steps in the model by working as a team.
- Apply that work to drafting a change strategy to be reviewed by coalition members.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
S. Elizabeth White |
|
|
Venita Sposetti |
Activity Number
0581-0000-17-006-L04-PCE Hours
Objectives
- Compare program admission policies and procedures with the expectations of the accreditation standards.
- List the required information on program outcomes that must be made available to the public.
- Describe the expectations for reporting of required annual monitoring parameters to ACPE.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
Mary Kiersma |
Activity Number
0581-0000-17-007-L04-PCE Hours
Objectives
- Describe the components of an effective assessment cycle for admissions.
- Develop an assessment plan for admissions processes.
- Select effective assessment tools for academic and non-academic admissions variables.
- Identify appropriate analytical and reporting strategies for admissions data.
Speaker(s)/Author(s)
|
Angie Choi |
|
|
Jacqui McLaughlin |
|
|
Linda Garavalia |
|
|
Megan H. Nguyen |
|
|
Schwanda K. Flowers |
|
|
Wendy Cox |